{"id":34092,"date":"2018-01-04T00:01:07","date_gmt":"2018-01-04T04:01:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/?p=34092"},"modified":"2018-01-04T00:01:07","modified_gmt":"2018-01-04T04:01:07","slug":"review-of-christ-triumphant-by-thomas-allin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/?p=34092","title":{"rendered":"Review of Christ Triumphant, by Thomas Allin"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/christ_triumphant_large.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/01\/christ_triumphant_large.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"166\" height=\"250\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-34097\" \/><\/a><em>Christ Triumphant<\/p>\n<p>Universalism Asserted as the Hope of the Gospel on the Authority of Reason, the Fathers, and Holy Scripture<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Annotated Edition<\/p>\n<p>by Thomas Allin<\/p>\n<p>edited and with an introductory essay and notes by Robin A. Parry<\/p>\n<p>Wipf &#038; Stock, Eugene, Oregon, 2015.  345 pages.<br \/>\nReprinted from the 9th ed. London: Williams and Norgate, 1905.  (First edition, 1885.)<br \/>\nStarred review<\/p>\n<p>This is a book from the nineteenth century that has been annotated and edited for today.  It\u2019s still in an old-fashioned style with very dense reading.<\/p>\n<p>But my goodness!  Thomas Allin lays out the case for Universalism unapologetically.  Some authors confess to doubts.  Not this one!  He is completely convinced of the Larger Hope \u2013 and his conviction and enthusiasm is contagious and joyous.<\/p>\n<p>The truth is, it\u2019s wonderful to be able to believe that God\u2019s love will indeed triumph and ALL the world will be saved \u2013 just like the Bible says!<\/p>\n<p>He covers three arguments, mentioned in the subtitle:  <\/p>\n<p>Reason \u2013 this makes sense with everything we know of God.<\/p>\n<p>In this section, he points out the logical fallacies in the teaching of a hell of unending torment after death.  He goes into great detail and tackles many possible arguments.  He points out the many logical fallacies of the belief in unending hell.<\/p>\n<p>Mind you, he\u2019s not saying there is no hell \u2013 only that it will not last for all eternity.  If you look at the Greek, that\u2019s not what the Bible teaches.  But in using reason, he points out such things as the fact that if all sin gets the same punishment \u2013 unending torment \u2013 then the punishment doesn\u2019t fit the crime.  If punishment is designed to restore the sinner \u2013 it will be different amounts depending on the sin that needs to be overcome.  Which makes a lot more sense, once you think about it.<\/p>\n<p>But there are many other arguments than that one.  Here\u2019s an example, chosen somewhat at random:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Pursuing our remarks, I must also remind you of another feature of the popular belief that seems to present a great difficulty; it is what I must call its paltriness, its unworthiness of God.  Let us for the moment not think of God as a good, loving, and righteous Being.  Let us now simply regard him as great, as irresistible, as almighty.  Viewed thus, how difficult is it to accept that account which the ordinary creed gives us of this Being\u2019s attempt at the rescue of his fallen creature, man.  An almighty Being puts forth every effort to gain a certain end; sends inspired men to teach others; works miracles, signs, wonders in heaven and on earth, all for this end of man\u2019s safety; nay, at the last, sends forth his own Son \u2013 very God \u2013 himself almighty.  The almighty Son stoops not alone to take our nature on him, but lower still \u2013 far lower \u2013 stoops to degradation; meekly accepts insults and scourging, bends to the bitter cross even, and all this to gain a certain end.  And yet, we are told, this end is not gained after all, man is not saved, for countless myriads are in fact left to hopeless, endless misery; and that, though for every one of these lost ones, so to speak, has been shed the lifeblood of God\u2019s own Son.  Now, if I may be permitted to speak freely, it is wholly inconceivable that the definite plan of an almighty Being should end in failure \u2013 that this should be the result of the agony of the Eternal Son.  God has, in the face of angels and of men, before the universe and its gaze of wonder, entered himself into the arena, become himself a combatant, has wrestled with the foe, and has been defeated.  I can bring myself to imagine those who reject the deity of Christ as believing in his defeat; but it is passing strange that those who believe him to be \u201cvery God Almighty,\u201d are loudest in asserting his failure.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The second section is called \u201cUniversalism Asserted on the Authority of Tradition\u201d \u2013 the majority of the church fathers believed in universalism, that at the end of the ages all will be saved and all will be restored.  <\/p>\n<p>This section is even denser, and even harder to read \u2013 because Thomas Allin pulls out quotations from hundreds of ancient writings.  If I thought nineteenth century prose was difficult to read \u2013 these are even harder.  However, that said, all the quotations make his case so decisively, it feels like overkill.<\/p>\n<p>He goes chronologically through the centuries, beginning with the very earliest church fathers and proves with quotations that many, many of the most respected pillars of the church clearly taught that God will save everyone at the end of the ages.<\/p>\n<p>An important point I had heard before is that the Greek word <em>aionian<\/em> &#8212; which is translated as \u201ceternal\u201d in English didn\u2019t really mean that at all in Greek.  \u201cOf the ages\u201d or \u201cage-long\u201d is a better translation, though it\u2019s not simple to translate \u2013 because we don\u2019t really even have a word for it in English.  But Thomas Allin makes the point that as long as the church fathers were native Greek speakers, the majority teaching of the church was that all mankind would (eventually) be saved, and that hell is restorative, not punitive.<\/p>\n<p>Most of this is too dense to pull out short quotes, but here\u2019s an example when he\u2019s looking at the writings of St. Jerome:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If, he says, we see one falling into sin we indeed are sorry, and hasten to rescue him, but we cannot be saddened, knowing that \u201cwith God <em>no rational creature perishes eternally\u201d<\/em> (<em>Commentary on Galatians 5:22<\/em>).  \u201cDeath shall come as a <em>visitor to the impious<\/em>; it will <em>not be perpetual<\/em>; it will not annihilate them; but will prolong its visit, <em>till the impiety which is in them shall be consumed<\/em>\u201d (<em>Commentary on Micah 5:8<\/em>).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here\u2019s part of the summary of that section:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>There is another point, whose importance \u2013 in view of some modern teaching \u2013 seems to me very great: it is the teaching of so many, and such illustrious Fathers, that death is no penalty, but is, indeed, <em>a cure<\/em>; that it is, in fact, the great Potter remolding his own handiwork to restore it to its pristine beauty, and that the sinner\u2019s destruction means but the destruction of the sin \u2013 the <em>sinner<\/em> perishes, the man lives.  Such teaching would be significant even in a solitary instance; but here we have witness upon witness, to whom Greek was a familiar and a living tongue, repeating the same striking idea; teaching death to be no penalty, but the remolding of our nature by the Heavenly Artist, and designed to cure sin; teaching, too, that the sinner\u2019s destruction by God is not loss but gain, is not annihilation, but conversion and reformation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The third section is called \u201cUniversalism Asserted on the Authority of Scripture.\u201d  Here the author gets especially animated and joyful \u2013 pointing out an abundance of passages that, taken at face value, strongly support the larger hope.  But those who support the popular view discount them or read into them things that aren\u2019t there \u2013 without even realizing that\u2019s what they\u2019re doing.<\/p>\n<p>Here\u2019s one of the many passages discussed in that section:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p> \u201cBut I say, <em>\u2019love your enemies.\u2019<\/em>\u201d  Will the advocates of endless penalty frankly tell us how that can be reconciled with the letter, or the spirit, of this text?  Will they explain why God commands us to love our enemies, when he consigns his own enemies to an endless hell; and why he bids us to do good to those who hate us, when he means for ever to punish and do evil to those who hate him?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here\u2019s another question:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Is God in earnest in telling us that he reconciles the <em>world?  Does he mean what he says<\/em>, or does he only mean that he will try to reconcile it, but will be baffled?  This question often rises unbidden, as we read these statements of the Bible, and compare them with the popular creed, which turns \u201call\u201d into \u201csome,\u201d when salvation is promised to \u201call,\u201d and turns the \u201cworld,\u201d when that is said to be saved, into a larger or smaller fraction of men.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There\u2019s a whole lot more where that came from.  I\u2019ve been considering this for years, but Thomas Allin finds yet more verses I hadn\u2019t thought of yet as teaching universalism \u2013 even though I already had noticed many.<\/p>\n<p>The final section is the conclusion and summary of all the arguments that went before and firmly asserts that we can confidently believe in universalism \u2013 and a triumphant Christ.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>With all earnestness, I repeat that our choice lies between accepting the victory of Christ or of evil, and <em>between these alternatives only.<\/em>  Escape from this dilemma there is none.  It avails nothing to diminish, as many now teach, the number of the lost; or to assert that they will be finally annihilated.  All such modifications leave quite <em>untouched<\/em> the central difficulty of the popular creed \u2013 the triumph of evil.  Sin for ever present with its taint, even in a <em>single<\/em> instance, is sin triumphant.  Sin that God has been unable to remove (and has had no resource but to annihilate the sinner) is sin triumphant and death victorious.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Here\u2019s the final paragraph, which makes my heart sing.  Truly, God is loving, and God is good \u2013 to <em>all<\/em> humanity.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>For my part, in this promise I believe \u2013 in the sole true catholicity of the church of Christ, as destined to embrace all mankind; in the power of his redemption, as something that no will can resist, to which all things must yield one day in perfect submission, love, and harmony.  I plead for the acceptance of this central truth as the great hope of the gospel, that the victory of Jesus Christ must be final and complete, i.e., that nothing can impair the power of his cross and passion to save the entire human race.  I believe that he shall see of the travail of his soul, and be satisfied.  And I feel assured that less than a world saved, a universe restored, could not satisfy the heart of Jesus Christ, or the love of our Father.  I ask all fair and reasonable minds to reject as immoral, and incredible the picture of a heavenly Parent, who, being absolutely free and absolute in power and goodness, creates any children of his own, whom he knows to be, in fact, certain to go to endless sin and ruin.  Therefore, in these pages I have pleaded for the larger hope.  Therefore, I believe in the vision, glorious, beyond all power of human thought fully to realize, of a \u201cparadise regained,\u201d of an universe from which every stain of sin shall have been swept away, in which every heart shall be full of blessedness in which \u201cGod shall be all in all.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><em>Amen.<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Amen, indeed!<\/p>\n<p>I marked many, many passages in this book to post in <a href=\"http:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/sonderquotes\/?s=christ+triumphant\">Sonderquotes<\/a> \u2013 but it\u2019s going to be awhile before I get them all posted.  However, you\u2019ll find some, even from the day I\u2019m posting this review.<\/p>\n<p>This book isn\u2019t easy reading.  I read a little bit per day over a very long period of time.  But its message is so joyful and uplifting.  If you would like to believe in universalism but think the Bible or even the historic church teaches differently \u2013 I highly, highly recommend delving through this book.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/wipfandstock.com\/\">wipfandstock.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/1498229123\/sonderbooksco-20\" target=\"outside\">Buy from Amazon.com<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Find this review on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sonderbooks.com\">Sonderbooks<\/a> at: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sonderbooks.com\/Nonfiction\/christ_triumphant.html\">www.sonderbooks.com\/Nonfiction\/christ_triumphant.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Disclosure: I am an Amazon Affiliate, and will earn a small percentage if you order a book on Amazon after clicking through from my site.<\/p>\n<p>Source: This review is based on a library book from Fairfax County Public Library.<\/p>\n<p>Disclaimer:  I am a professional librarian, but I maintain my website and blogs on my own time.  The views expressed are solely my own, and in no way represent the official views of my employer or of any committee or group of which I am part.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/share\" class=\"twitter-share-button\" data-count=\"none\" data-via=\"Sonderbooks\">Tweet<\/a><script type=\"text\/javascript\" src=\"http:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>What did you think of this book?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Christ Triumphant Universalism Asserted as the Hope of the Gospel on the Authority of Reason, the Fathers, and Holy Scripture Annotated Edition by Thomas Allin edited and with an introductory essay and notes by Robin A. Parry Wipf &#038; Stock, Eugene, Oregon, 2015. 345 pages. Reprinted from the 9th ed. London: Williams and Norgate, 1905. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34,2,42],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-christian","category-nonfiction-review","category-starred-review"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=34092"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34092\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=34092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=34092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sonderbooks.com\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=34092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}